AgfaVista 400
Warm cast, saturated yet muted, according to one review
- Manufacturer
- Agfa-Gevaert (2003 datasheet); AgfaPhoto under license (later stock)
- ISO
- 400
- Type
- Color negative
- Process
- C-41
- Formats
- 135
- Status
- Discontinued (2018)
- Datasheet
- F-AF-E6
- Preset
- GA — 070 / P
Character
- Contrast
- Somewhat muted in reviews of the later stock
- Grain
- RMS granularity 4.5 (Agfa, 2003); reviews call it heavy for ISO 400
- Latitude
- −1 to +4 f-stops (Agfa, 2003)
- Best for
- Street and colorful scenes, not portraits (one review)
Agfa Vista 400 was an ISO 400 consumer color negative film for C-41 processing, made by Agfa-Gevaert and listed in the company’s May 2003 brochure in 135-12, 135-24+3 and 135-36 cartridges [1]. The name outlived Agfa’s own film: after AgfaPhoto GmbH failed in 2005, Lupus Imaging & Media sold AgfaPhoto Vista Plus 400, which is widely believed to have been made by Fujifilm. That stock was reported discontinued in March 2018 [2]. Most reviews describe the later stock, not the 2003 film.
Look and color
The datasheet and most reviews cover different products, so read this section with that in mind. Agfa’s only color claim is technical: its “EYE VISION” sensitization matches the film’s response more closely to the eye [1]. That is a marketing argument, not a measurement.
- Saturated but muted. Casual Photophile describes a neo-vintage look that is “both pastel and saturated”: “Greens and blues are rich and deep, while reds and yellows tend to be bright without being overbearing” [3]. Jim Grey, shooting an expired roll of the original Agfacolor Vista 400, found “true” colors that looked “slightly oversaturated”, a palette “different from the Kodak and Fuji stocks” [4].
- Warmer than most films. Casual Photophile reports an overall warm cast [3].
- Skin tones are a weak point. The same review says skin comes out inaccurate because the film is more sensitive to red light than portrait films, and that overexposure softens the effect [3].
- The stock matters. Jim Grey’s roll was expired and stored frozen, and he calls any Agfacolor Vista 400 today expired [4]. No review separates the film from its age, batch or scan.
Tonality
- Contrast. Casual Photophile calls the images “somewhat muted”, with an aged look from the moment they leave the camera [3]. Jim Grey found neutrals and blacks rendered well in some frames [4]. The brochure plots density curves for the three layers, but we have not read numbers from them.
- Latitude. Agfa gives −1 to +4 f-stops, half a stop more on the overexposure side than the Vista 200 [1].
- Underexposure. Jim Grey shot at box speed and got frames “from slightly to very underexposed”, and planned to rate the last roll at ISO 200. The film was expired, so this says more about age than about the 2003 latitude [4].
Grain and sharpness
Agfa rates grain with RMS granularity (×1000), a measured value, and does not use Kodak’s Print Grain Index; the two scales cannot be compared [1].
| Film (Agfa brochure, 2003) | RMS granularity |
|---|---|
| Agfa Ultra 100 | 3.8 [1] |
| Agfa Vista 100 | 4.0 [1] |
| Agfa Vista 200 | 4.3 [1] |
| Agfa Vista 400 | 4.5 [1] |
| Agfa Vista 800 | 5.0 [1] |
- Resolving power is 130 lines/mm at contrast 1000:1 and 45 lines/mm at 1.6:1 [1], against 50 lines/mm at 1.6:1 for the Vista 200 [1].
- Reviews disagree about the later stock. Casual Photophile calls it not a sharp film and says the “heavy grain of 400 speed film remains a very real issue” for enlargements [3]. A Lomography user review reportedly calls the grain “surprisingly fine”; we saw only a search-result extract, not the page. Jim Grey noticed grain in some frames of the expired roll [4].
Spectral sensitivity
The blue-sensitive layer holds a plateau near 2.0 log from about 415 to 470 nm and peaks at 471 nm, the green layer peaks near 550 nm and the red layer near 616 nm with a shoulder around 648 nm [1]. Blue and green cross near 496 nm and green and red near 580 nm. The Grain Archive style is tuned from the datasheet and the reviews; it is not computed from these curves.
Datasheet digest
| Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ISO speed | ISO 400/27° | [1] |
| Granularity (RMS, ×1000) | 4.5 (Vista 100: 4.0; Vista 200: 4.3; Vista 800: 5.0; Ultra 100: 3.8) | [1] |
| Resolving power | 130 lines/mm at contrast 1000:1; 45 lines/mm at contrast 1.6:1 | [1] |
| Exposure latitude | −1 to +4 f-stops | [1] |
| Layer thickness | 19 µm | [1] |
| Film base | Acetyl cellulose, 120 µm in 35 mm films | [1] |
| Process | AP 70 / C-41 | [1] |
| Markings | Margin marks AGFA VISTA 400-C; negative code 113-13; 3 red triangles | [1] |
Names, status and history
- Agfa-Gevaert era. The 2003 brochure lists Vista 100, 200, 400 and 800. Vista 400 came in 135 cartridges of 12, 24+3 and 36 frames [1].
- AgfaPhoto Vista Plus 400. Since 2005, Lupus Imaging & Media distributed the Vista films, and DPReview writes that Fujifilm is widely believed to have made them [2]. Casual Photophile’s 2016 profile is of this stock, which it says was sold in British Poundland stores for £1 and is commonly thought to be repackaged Superia [3].
- Fuji Superia X-tra 400: reported, not confirmed. Jim Grey writes that the newer Vista 400 was a rebranded Superia X-tra 400 and that the original Agfa emulsion carries Agfacolor branding [4]. We found no statement from Fujifilm or Lupus. Casual Photophile, discussing the Vista line in 2018, writes that Vista was, “nearest we can tell”, Fuji C200 [5]: sources point to different Fuji films.
- Discontinuation (2018). DPReview reported on March 12, 2018 that Vista was no longer made, with ISO 200 and 400 still on sale from specialist retailers but expected to run out [2].
- Availability now. We found no current listing. Any roll you find is old stock.
Also sold as
- Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 (reported source of the later stock; not confirmed by Fujifilm or Lupus) (reported) [4]
Alternatives
- GA — 056 Agfa Vista 200
Same 2003 brochure, one stop slower: RMS 4.3 against 4.5 and a latitude of −1½ to +3½ f-stops against −1 to +4
- GA — 010 Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400
Reportedly the film sold as Vista 400 in its later years, according to Jim Grey; not confirmed by Fujifilm or Lupus
- GA — 009 Kodak UltraMax 400
Same speed and consumer positioning: a Kodak consumer 400 color negative
- GA — 057 Konica Centuria 400
Another ISO 400 consumer color negative from the same period
- GA — 004 Kodak Portra 400
The professional alternative that a reviewer contrasts with Vista 400's grain and skin rendering
Get the look in darktable
The GA — 070 / P preset, inspired by Agfa Vista 400, is a darktable 5.6 style of 5 native modules, with no LUT. It sits on top of your own exposure and tone mapping.
| Zone | Metric | Before → after |
|---|---|---|
| sky | C (chroma) | 27.5 → 31.8 |
| sea | C (chroma) | 22.2 → 25.3 |
| skin | C (chroma) | 16.4 → 23.6 |
Settings, all measurements and limits of the Agfa Vista 400 preset
GA — 070 / P · darktable preset
Vista 400
for darktable
See real photos
Scans of real Agfa Vista 400 film, published by others:
- Casual Photophile: AgfaPhoto Vista Plus 400 film profile, with sample photos casualphotophile.com
- Down the Road (Jim Grey): First roll impressions of Agfacolor Vista 400, with scans blog.jimgrey.net
- Casual Photophile: Agfa Vista was more than just another color film, with Vista 400 sample photos casualphotophile.com
Questions about Agfa Vista 400
Is Agfa Vista 400 discontinued?
Yes. DPReview reported on March 12, 2018, citing Japan Camera Hunter, that Agfa Vista color negative film was no longer made and stock was drying up worldwide. The 2003 Agfa-Gevaert film had left the market earlier: the AgfaPhoto-branded Vista sold up to 2018 was, reportedly, made by Fujifilm. Any roll you find now is old stock.
Is Agfa Vista 400 the same as Fuji Superia X-tra 400?
Reportedly, for the later stock. Jim Grey writes that the newer Vista 400 was a rebranded Superia X-tra 400, and Casual Photophile notes a common belief that it was repackaged Superia. Neither Fujifilm nor the distributor confirmed it. The 2003 Agfa-Gevaert Vista 400 in the brochure is a different, earlier product.
Is Agfa Vista 400 grainy?
Agfa gave it an RMS granularity of 4.5 in 2003, between Vista 200 at 4.3 and Vista 800 at 5.0. Casual Photophile calls the grain of the later AgfaPhoto stock a very real issue for enlargements, while Jim Grey saw it in some frames of an expired original roll. RMS cannot be compared with Kodak's Print Grain Index.
Is Agfa Vista 400 good for portraits?
One review says no: Casual Photophile writes that skin tones come out inaccurate because of a stronger red sensitivity than portrait films have, and suggests overexposing to soften the effect. It recommends the later AgfaPhoto stock for street and colorful urban scenes instead. That is one reviewer's opinion of a later, related film.
What ISO should I shoot Agfa Vista 400 at?
Box speed is ISO 400, and Agfa's 2003 brochure gives a latitude of −1 to +4 f-stops. Jim Grey shot an expired original roll at box speed and got frames from slightly to very underexposed, then planned to rate the next roll at 200. That is one photographer's experience with aged film, not a specification.
Sources
- 1DS Agfa-Gevaert, Technical Data: Range of Agfa standard films, F-AF-E6 (6th edition, May 2003), third-party copy
- 2C DPReview: Report: Agfa Vista film is no more, stock drying up world-wide (March 12, 2018, after Japan Camera Hunter) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 3C Casual Photophile: AgfaPhoto Vista Plus 400, film profile (December 27, 2016) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 4C Down the Road: First roll impressions, Agfa Agfacolor Vista 400 (Jim Grey, March 7, 2022) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 5C Casual Photophile: Agfa Vista was more than just another color film (Jeb Inge, March 16, 2018) Accessed September 30, 2026.
DS: datasheet · C: review or community