GA — 068 Color negative

FujifilmFujicolor C200

Cool green-blue cast in most reviews, strong greens and reds; one reviewer saw pink highlights

Manufacturer
Fujifilm
ISO
200
Type
Color negative
Process
C-41
Formats
135
Status
Renamed (2022)
Datasheet
AF3-0249E

Also known as Fujifilm 200 (Fujicolor 200) (rename, 2022, disputed [3]).

Now sold as Fujifilm 200 (Fujicolor 200).

Status checked [3]

After: beach cabin under storm clouds, with the preset inspired by Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 (GA — 068 / P) applied (simulation). Before: the same beach cabin under storm clouds, base development without a preset.
fig. 1 · GA — 068 / P · simulation on a digital RAW, not a film scan Drag, tap or use the arrow keys

Character

Contrast
Medium slope on the datasheet (our reading); reviews say a little more than Kodak Gold 200
Grain
Diffuse RMS granularity 4 (Fujifilm's scale)
Latitude
Little tested; reviewers report muddy results when underexposed
Best for
Everyday daylight and flash shooting on a budget

Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 is a daylight-type ISO 200 color negative film for C-41 processing, sold in 35 mm only [1]. Reviewers treat it as Fujifilm’s budget film, one of the cheapest 35 mm color films on the market [5] [8]. It is not the same film as Superia 200, which it replaced in Fujifilm’s 35 mm line [4]. In the US it has been sold as Fujicolor 200 (Fujifilm 200 on the datasheet) since 2022, and whether that film is the same emulsion is disputed [3].

Look and color

  • What Fujifilm promised. Smooth, “beautiful” and natural skin tones, and no correction filter in daylight or with electronic flash [1].
  • A cool, green-blue cast in most reviews. Next to Kodak Gold 200, one tester saw “a more greenish bluish cast” [6].
  • Greens are the highlight. Reviewers call them the “typical Fuji look” and well rendered [5] [8] [9]. Blues are also praised [8].
  • Reds can be punchy. One reviewer loves that it “can get really punchy” in the reds [5], while another found the reds and blues loud next to Gold 200 [6].
  • One review disagrees on the cast. 50mmF2 saw a pink or magenta cast in highlights and overexposed frames, the same on two rolls developed separately, and no green in the shadows [7]. The other reviews we read lean green-blue. Scans and labs differ, and these are single-roll impressions, not measurements.
  • Skin. Natural at box speed, pink when overexposed, according to the same reviewer [7].

Tonality

  • Curve. On the datasheet’s characteristic curves the toe runs from log H −4 to about −2.5, then the three layers follow a straight line with no visible shoulder to the edge of the graph, at log H +0.3. The slope reads at roughly 0.6, higher in green and blue than in red (our approximate reading) [1].
  • Contrast. “An extra boost in contrast” over Gold 200 for 50mmF2 [7], noticeably stronger contrast for Emulsive [6], “a good amount of contrast” for Parallax [8]. Fujifilm gives no numeric contrast value.
  • Latitude is thinly documented. A reader comment quoted by Casual Photophile calls underexposed frames muddy. The article’s author found the film best at 200 or 400, and pushing to ISO 800 gave “muddy and bland” results [9]. The 35mmc reviewer notes a lower dynamic range than Portra and manages it with metering [5]. Overexposure brings pink skin [7].
  • Long exposures. No correction from 1/4000 to 2 s, then +1/3 stop at 4 s, +2/3 at 16 s and +1 at 64 s [1].

Grain and sharpness

Fujifilm publishes a diffuse RMS granularity, measured through a 48 µm aperture at a density of 1.0 above minimum. It is a different scale from Kodak’s Print Grain Index, so the table compares only Fujifilm sheets [1].

Film Diffuse RMS granularity Resolving power (1.6:1 / 1000:1)
Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 4 [1] 50 / 125 lines/mm [1]
Fujifilm Superia 200 4 [11] 50 / 125 lines/mm [11]
Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 4 [10] 50 / 125 lines/mm [10]
  • Fujifilm calls the grain fine for a high-speed film and credits its “New Super Uniform Fine Grain Technology” [1].
  • Reviews: “significantly finer grain” than Kodak Gold 200 in Emulsive’s test [6], slightly less than Gold 200 but “noticeable” for 50mmF2, and more visible in low light [7]. Parallax writes “a nice distinct grain” [8], and 35mmc finds the grain in dark areas attractive [5].
  • Sharpness: Fujifilm publishes an MTF curve and the resolving powers above [1].

Spectral sensitivity

The datasheet plots three layers. The blue layer holds a plateau from about 405 to 450 nm and peaks near 470 nm, the green layer peaks near 560 nm, and the red layer rises to a broad plateau that peaks near 640 nm [1]. Blue and green cross near 494 nm, green and red near 581 nm. There is no fourth layer on this sheet, unlike Superia 200 [1] [4]. The Grain Archive color style is tuned from the datasheet and the reviews above; it is not computed from these curves.

fig. 2 · spectral sensitivityFUJIFILM FUJICOLOR C200 · DATASHEET FUJIFILM AF3-0249E
Spectral sensitivity of Fujifilm Fujicolor C200, by layerRelative log sensitivity of the three light-sensitive layers (CN-16, density 1.0 above D-min), from the Fujicolor C200 datasheet. Blue holds a plateau from about 405 nm to 450 nm and peaks near 470 nm, green peaks near 560 nm and red rises to a broad plateau that peaks near 640 nm; there is no fourth layer on this datasheet. 400450500550600650700 10.50 λ (nm) relative sensitivity
Relative log sensitivity of the three light-sensitive layers (CN-16, density 1.0 above D-min), from the Fujicolor C200 datasheet. Blue holds a plateau from about 405 nm to 450 nm and peaks near 470 nm, green peaks near 560 nm and red rises to a broad plateau that peaks near 640 nm; there is no fourth layer on this datasheet. Each layer is scaled to its own peak. Color styles are tuned from the datasheet and published reviews, then measured; they are not computed from these curves. Source: datasheet p. 6, traced pixel by pixel from the graph image in the PDF.

Datasheet digest

Fujifilm datasheet AF3-0249E, edition 2017-05 (Print code 17.05-BX; the sheet carries no explicit date). Read the datasheet (PDF) on asset.fujifilm.com Source: manufacturer. The Grain Archive does not host datasheets.

Key figures for Fujifilm Fujicolor C200
ItemValueSource
ISO speed200/24° in daylight; 50/18° under 3200 K tungsten with a Wratten 80A (or Fuji LBB-12) filter[1]
Diffuse RMS granularity4 (48 µm aperture, 1.0 above D-min)[1]
Resolving power50 lines/mm at 1.6:1 chart contrast; 125 lines/mm at 1000:1[1]
Characteristic curveToe from log H −4 to about −2.5, then a straight line to the edge of the graph (log H +0.3), no visible shoulder; slope about 0.6, steeper in green and blue than in red (our reading of the graph)[1]
ReciprocityNo correction from 1/4000 to 2 s; +1/3 stop at 4 s, +2/3 at 16 s, +1 at 64 s[1]
Fluorescent lightMay give a greenish tint, corrected at printing; no filter advised[1]
BaseCellulose triacetate, 122 µm (135)[1]
Production numberC74 and above[1]
ProcessC-41 or Fujifilm CN-16 family; processing and printing described as almost the same as Superia 200[1]

Names, status and history

  • Datasheet. The bulletin is AF3-0249E, print code 17.05-BX. It applies to production number C74 and above and lists only the 135 format [1]. It says processing and printing are almost the same as for Superia 200 [1].
  • 2017. When Superia 200 was discontinued, Wikipedia says the “older technology Fujicolor C200 (without 4th color layer)” was advised as the replacement [4]. By 2021, 50mmF2 counted C200 and Superia X-TRA 400 as the only two color negative films Fujifilm still made in 35 mm [7].
  • January 2022. Kosmo Foto reported that Fujifilm rebranded C200 as Fujicolor 200 in the US, with Fujifilm 200 on the datasheet [3].
    • The article was later updated to note that the new datasheet resembles a Kodak color negative film’s, and a commenter said its curves are not the C200 curves [3].
    • We found no official statement on whether the emulsion changed, so we treat “Fujifilm 200 is C200” as reported, not confirmed. See also the Kodak Gold 200 page.
  • September 30, 2026. Fujifilm’s US consumer film page listed Fujifilm 200 and Fujifilm 400, and no Fujicolor C200 [2].

Alternatives

  • GA — 051 Fujifilm Superia 200

    The film it replaced in Fujifilm's 35 mm line; adds a fourth color layer, same published RMS granularity of 4

  • GA — 008 Kodak Gold 200

    The usual ISO 200 comparison: one test found C200 finer-grained, cooler and more contrasty than Gold 200

  • GA — 010 Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400

    Same Fujifilm family and same published RMS granularity of 4, one stop faster

  • GA — 028 Fujifilm 400

    The ISO 400 film sold beside Fujifilm 200 in the US consumer line

Get the look in darktable

The GA — 068 / P preset, inspired by Fujifilm Fujicolor C200, is a darktable 5.6 style of 5 native modules, with no LUT. It sits on top of your own exposure and tone mapping.

Measured on test RAW files, CIELab
ZoneMetricBefore → after
skyC (chroma)27.5 → 33.3
seaC (chroma)22.2 → 27.4
skinC (chroma)16.4 → 15.2

Settings, all measurements and limits of the Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 preset

GA — 068 / P · darktable preset

Fujicolor C200
for darktable

Full pack · 87 presets · yours to keep
.dtstyle file, darktable 5.6 or later

Try the free pack first · What the full pack contains

See real photos

Scans of real Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 film, published by others:

Questions about Fujifilm Fujicolor C200

Is Fujicolor C200 discontinued?

Under that name, in the US, yes. Kosmo Foto reported on January 4, 2022 that Fujifilm rebranded it Fujicolor 200 (Fujifilm 200 on the datasheet). On September 30, 2026, Fujifilm's US consumer film page listed Fujifilm 200 and Fujifilm 400 and no C200. Whether the emulsion is unchanged is disputed. [2] [3]

Is Fujifilm 200 the same film as C200?

Unclear. Kosmo Foto called the change a rebrand, but a reader comment on that article says the new datasheet's curves are practically identical to a Kodak film's and not to the C200 curves, and the article notes a resemblance to a Kodak datasheet. We found no statement from Fujifilm or Kodak settling it, so treat it as unconfirmed. [3]

Does Fujicolor C200 have a fourth color layer?

No. Its datasheet plots three sensitivity curves: blue, green and red. Wikipedia describes C200 as older technology than Superia 200, without the fourth layer, and says Fujifilm UK advised it as the replacement when Superia 200 ended in 2017. [1] [4]

Does Fuji C200 have a green cast?

Most reviews we read say it leans cool: 'a more greenish bluish cast' next to Kodak Gold 200, and strong greens. One reviewer saw the opposite, a pink or magenta cast in highlights and in overexposed frames, and no green in the shadows. The lab and scanner probably play a part. [6] [7]

What ISO should I shoot Fujicolor C200 at?

Box speed is 200. Fujifilm rates it 50 under 3200 K tungsten with an 80A filter. One reviewer found it best at 200 or 400, and pushing to 800 gave muddy, bland images. Another reports pink skin when overexposed. Underexposed frames look muddy in reader comments and reviews. [1] [7] [9]

Sources

  1. 1DS Fujifilm Fujicolor C200, product information bulletin AF3-0249E (17.05-BX)
  2. 2M Fujifilm USA: consumer film, product listing Accessed September 30, 2026.
  3. 3C Kosmo Foto: Fujifilm rebrands Fujicolor C200 in the US (Stephen Dowling, January 4, 2022) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  4. 4C Wikipedia: Fujifilm Superia Accessed September 30, 2026.
  5. 5C 35mmc: Fuji C200, mini review (Phil Stefans, November 12, 2019) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  6. 6C Emulsive: Kodak Gold 200 vs Fujicolor C200 comparison (Daniel Marinelli, September 13, 2019) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  7. 7C 50mmF2: Fujifilm Fujicolor C200 film review (June 4, 2021) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  8. 8C Parallax Photographic Coop: Fuji C200 film review Accessed September 30, 2026.
  9. 9C Casual Photophile: Fuji C200 film (Tamara Saade, July 7, 2021) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  10. 10DS Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400, product information bulletin AF3-151E, copy hosted by 125px
  11. 11DS Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia 200, data sheet AF3-026E (print code EIGI-98.10)

DS: datasheet · M: manufacturer · C: review or community